WS Questions

1. 35 - Would he have expected R&D to have included R&D in regards to product safety?

   1. Would he agree that should have been a priority at all times?

Now-WS

1. CABO0000196

   1. Page 2 - Why would the government "undoubtedly wish to adopt a reasonably low profile"?

   2. Page 5 - "It would be extremely damaging to the Government to be linked with the proposed research" - Can he elaborate on this?

   3. Page 5 - "The Government would be extremely vulnerable to criticism if it had failed to commission research work for which there was a clear scientific need" - Would he have agreed with that point?

      1. Would he agree, in principle, that this point would hold true if, for example, the government (/a public body) was producing a product which it knew *could* be dangerous. And so, there was a clear scientific need to make said product safer. “The Government would be extremely vulnerable to criticism if it had failed to commission research work” to make that product safer?

2. DHSC0032264_155

   1. Can he provide any recollections he has about his trip to San Francisco? Did he have any particular observations following that trip?